InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Steelers_Fan

10/10/06 4:32 PM

#94092 RE: brewskih #94084

Brew -

Your first point - I though I heard him say by the end of the year?

icon url

success622

10/10/06 4:57 PM

#94106 RE: brewskih #94084

No one stated Nextcode nor OP3 had an implied license.
It was simply stated there are two types of licenses; direct license of the IP and license of qode which contains an implied license to the IP
If someone said that, I guess I missed that post.

Also referencing your point #8
NEOM did NOT State they aren't in search = in fact Chas Fritz (CF) clearly stated that one of the 5 patent "sets" or categories if you will, his term, IS mobile search - note it was set 2 - which CF stated includes ads off location based search; incidently also including comparison shopping and contextural ecommerce. (These are from the acquired patents from BarPoint/LoyaltPoint.)

If the call is put on the company website, anyone can refresh their memory or hear that for the first time.







icon url

RetiredinFL

10/10/06 5:27 PM

#94124 RE: brewskih #94084

Good post, Brew. Don't want to nit-pick words, but you have some very good points.
icon url

N E O M

10/10/06 6:42 PM

#94138 RE: brewskih #94084

Regarding point #2, they are transgressig our patents! See previous posts of mine.