Replies to post #132625 on OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp (OWCP)

[surfkast]

Who authorized the TA to accept his ability to submit documentation? Or is the TA complicit?

[I-Glow]

The complaint stated that OWCP supplied the fraudulent documents to Friedland - not that Friedland created the documents.

Being on the advisory board - unless it is a typical pinky incestuous relationship between the insiders.

We know that Friedland was part of OWCP from the beginning - we know the company provided him fraudulent documents from a disbarred attorney to remove the restrictive legend so he could deposit the certs in various accounts.

"OWC provided an attorney opinion letter to OWC’s transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with the issuance of OWC’s stock to Global."

The SEC clearly states that OWCP provided the opinion letter.

Since the TA is paid by OWCP - they would have less reason to question the Veracity of the documents.

There isn't any question that OWCP was heavily involved in the pump and dump.

Hence - the SEC is continuing the investigation.

IG