I said you were changing the subject not the story (to Arland and 15+ million shares suddenly instead of Optex issuing shares to Arland as you have claimed) and are straying from the current subject.
I am trying to correct you on one point first which is that Optex issued shares to Alpha, not Arland.
Once you see that, I can move to the next part but only after you see that Optex issued shares to Alpha in 2008 and not to Arland.
If I can't get you to understand this first pretty obvious one, I'm wasting my time to try and correct your other statements I believe to be inaccurate.
All IMO only, good luck.