Read my response to Backstabbed (Post#34155) for my thoughts:
Well, your statement makes no sense. It comes down to Patrick's trust and honesty in the end. If PDXP is honest in their NVC funds (so are all the sister companies). This should mean that Patrick was honest about his crypto dealings as well and we should have no problem with the sister companies. If we find out he's lying about crypto, this shows a lack of trust in the CEO and you can say he's a crook. If this is the case, PDXP will burn just like the others because why would people invest in a crook CEO? All three companies in the end SHOULD have the same fate. Either soar or crash. Make sense?
It's utterly nonsensical to say one will survive while the others will not, if the underlying argument in our case against the SEC is Patrick has been honest with everything he's said. Let me know if this makes sense, or I can explain in a better way. Go $PDXP, $VICT, $CHIT.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
