InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

sln1

10/08/06 10:47 AM

#10214 RE: tjak #10213

we bin had.
icon url

Whitewolf

10/08/06 10:55 AM

#10215 RE: tjak #10213

tjak...IF the company truly has marketable products and is earnestly trying to develop their business plan in the interest of all concerned (mgmt and shareholders) then the answer is simple...they needed $$$ to operate. However, if there is any hanky panky going on then I defer to the answer from sln1 in the previous post.

Verification of something concrete regarding the business will be most welcome about now...Jonathan???



icon url

Stock_Stalker

10/08/06 11:50 AM

#10217 RE: tjak #10213

I know deals are made to secure financing, the legality of it all as far as not reporting these sales, with Pinkies I have no idea what they have to do.

If I believe what JB says through the e-mail replies that many have posted here, then he has sunk bigger ching in this and I have to believe and trust his vision.

I had been spammed several times with LITL, I was curious about it and was watching it, I almost bought in at 50 cents for 10K shares, but spent it on PTSC and some MAGS, both of which had been left in the dust by LITL.

As I read some posts on there, it became a riskier gamble on that one and there was Janice that was preaching, I think she is right, but many know that she is right and are taking their chances getting caught. There is nothing behind LITL that you can find, whereas, MDFY there is pleanty.

The poster 'up-down' is pretty keen to LITL and it playing it and he has done his DD.

MDFY, well, not a quick buck maker like LITL, but I would be more comfortable with MDFY then LITL and I trust management at MDFY.