ah- but he is pitching it all wrong- making it sound so much better than it is
that strikes me as bogus- just like the continual presentation of a graph with percentages without any explanation that it is based on NEXT TO NO PATIENTS. As sox posts constantly, just to get under my skin. but it should get under everybody's skin because it is intellectually dishonest to pretend the small trial numbers add up to reliable percentages
it ain't right
but of course people do not want any part of a very simple truth, they would rather see pretty lines on graphs that have little to back them up