If so, and its hard to imagine it not being so, it seems the reason is no one cares enough about it maybe because it's otc? If so, then I call corruption on the SEC as well for allowing, which is tantamount to enabling. And if their excuse is not enough manpower, not buying that either. The gov't has no problem wasting tons of money and cleaning up corrupt markets probably would probably be better economically, and it creates jobs, so I don't buy any excuses. The otc is rife w/phony companies that rip off ppl. I know of cases where scumbag ceo's openly brag about about how stupid his shareholder are for believing in it and at the same time has an absolutely fantastic looking website and an awesome looking online business, while the pps stays in the trips for years. And that's just one. What about this Kipping dude? I dont know if he's guilty or not but there's like 1 person who ever hasn't labeled him a ripoff. All I know is 15 money laundering houses in the carries don't look good no matter what anyone says. So let's just say he's guilty as charged...so how come the SEC has no problem w/him? It's been years. What's up w/the cases locksmith & vplm have against each other? Anyone have a clue? Rant over....except why's it take so long to rule on such an open & shut, frivolous case as the apple motion (or so that's how it's been characterized)? And who exactly over at the PTAB (those angels...) is deciding? Every direction I look I see the words FARCE FARCE FARCE... Ok, I'm done now..
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
