InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rbtree

02/09/18 12:35 AM

#57808 RE: Karma11 #57807

EFLN is a scam, save for the Trading Post. And Pena merely parroted the company in repeating their fraudulent claim of $520m in assets....They might have a couple million..

Plus, this latest letter only has a couple changes. It includes the annual report..as being reviewed. And it shows a ~$120,000 decline in assets... so, still about $518 million too much....
icon url

Value_Investor

02/09/18 12:20 PM

#57809 RE: Karma11 #57807

EFLN hit 0.0009 today! It might test another bid support 0.0008 or even 0.0007 as soon as tomorrow since the USA market crashed...

Hopefully it won't decline to 0.0008 as soon as today!

icon url

rrojarom

02/10/18 2:45 PM

#57818 RE: Karma11 #57807

Is there any facts to back it all up?

The CEO said to review the reports since inception however could not answer for any discrepancies I inquired about, for example a simple one is how on earth does the citrus business claim exactly $350,000.00 every quarter? You can trade/track citrus in the commodity market and it fluctuates like a demon in heat day to day, slowly decking quarter by quarter. There’s no way a business has a perfectly wounded number exactly the same every quarter.
https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/citrus-world-markets-and-trade

But I gave up on the numbers and their inability to answer those questions.

The market has been ‘correcting itself’ since August pump and dump to .0047 which seems to be the wrong direction. Or previously was April .0003 to .0069, took four days to fall back to .001. Looks like .001 is it as that is where it settled after two runs.

http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/efln/historical

It hasn’t been .01 how’s it going to make it to .20?

That’s two attorney letters yet it’s still stamped with a CE, why?

They have me intrigued I’ll admit but can’t convince a crew to jump in without some basic answers...
the CE doesn’t help either...
Not a low float...
No technicals in the chart...


I’m looking for the string to dangle in front of the cats...


Can’t argue with your last statement at all...