Hi Scott,
I stand by what I have previously written. Regarding my response to zzaatt, what I was trying to say to zzaatt in polite terms with a hint of irony was "mind your own business". I have previously stated that the only person having any influence over whether I'm in or out with my investment is myself. I think that this investment is high risk and you may remember my saying (I think I even said this in a recent reply to zzaaatt) that such a high risk stock needs to be watched at all times. I also stated in a (now deleted) post, it was in a response to you, that with this type of stock my advice would be to be prepared to "reconsider", i.e. sell and move on.
I don't think that the concerns voiced yesterday can be described as some sort of "hysteria", to me they were (are) justified. If zzaatt thinks that someone who expressed concerns yesterday should "NOT" (direct quote) invest in biotech (this is how I read his post) then he is entitled to his opinion. I will think no less of zzaatt for expressing his opinion, but I can voice my opinion, too. The variety of views on this board should be welcomed (I exclude name calling) and it would be unfair to judge anyone harshly because of a difference in opinion.
I have read the article voova told us about. When you look at the end it is suggested that the author(s) may invest within the next 72 hours. I do not think this is the case with the Edison report. I am glad that it has finally been properly referred to.
As of now I am holding my shares, but I am watching very carefully what is happening and may reconsider.
I hope this clears things up.
Regards,
HB
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
