InvestorsHub Logo

toobigtojail

02/05/18 10:47 AM

#48324 RE: penny2pound #48323

it also gets more expensive for Apple as time goes by...what will a jury think of all this?

VVVVVV

02/05/18 12:54 PM

#48338 RE: penny2pound #48323

Again, people are so forcused on Apple. I don’t believe they’re going to be a player in this. There’re a number of other infringers and companies that could jump in, right before the eyes of Apple.

Also, not sure besides the Ex parte communication, they can argue in the appeal to Federal Court. I don’t believe I read pages and pages of arguments regarding the claims, that might have been overlooked and or misinterpreted. I believe they have to use their argument used in the Motion for a rehearing, if I remember correctly. They didn’t have any arguments about the claims,etc, regarding the Patents. It was all based on the ex parte communication. Not too sure if they can use any now. I believe their arguments and responses are passed onto Federal court. But, I’d have to check on this. There’re requirements in their appeal they have to follow.

But, they’ll argue this ex parte communication, as long as they can. Not too sure how they can prove the judges were influenced. Especially when they stated they didn’t have any proof it in fact influenced them.