Replies to post #18584 on US Precious Metals (fka USPR)

[russo123]

not sure the lawyer costs a minimum of $750,000 though, so... and maybe pane is planning to counter sue uspr and the lawyer is doing this on a contingency basis.

we shall see.

[russo123]

well, what about uspr's claim that the new, new, new, new, new, new ceo has "extensive technical background in mining technologies"?? where's that proof?? what's his "extensive background"??? where did he get this extensive background?

how about the fact that the last 8k statement from uspr says they lost the land in mexico. anything on that??? or that they had no money to pay their lawyers. anything????

or that uspr, or someone that works for them, or that they hired, on a saturday night, between 5:18 and 6:43, updated the new uspr website to change a statement that the new, new, new, new, new, new ceo said so that he wouldn't have made a promise that he clearly did not keep.

there's nothing coming out of uspr now that is business related. suing the former ceo. fine. announcing that a shareholder is suing the ceo, doesn't help them at all.

what about the mine? does uspr own the land? do they have any money? do they have a business plan that makes sense?

anything?????