InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Drillman7

10/06/06 7:45 AM

#111102 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

Makes sense FFB good post if it comes true then I will be one happy man ,,,,,,,,Good luck and my the force be with us today.
icon url

Suljak

10/06/06 7:52 AM

#111103 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

Thanks Fish...
Here is one of our stockholders, she will be at the Vegas party...still working on getting the stock symbol corrected

icon url

FeverPitch

10/06/06 7:54 AM

#111105 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

Great Post and a MUST READ !!!
jmho
icon url

ChrisJP

10/06/06 7:58 AM

#111108 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

WHY IS THIS SO HARD FOR SOME TO UNDERSTAND ?

Ummmmm ... because just about every so-called naked-short-position-name-your-own-stock-price-get-rich-quick story has turned out to not be true ?

Chris
icon url

Chappy86

10/06/06 8:01 AM

#111109 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

FISH For Breakfast. I've been in since February before Loftworks began courting Sulja. Everything I've read about this organization has happened Pre-SLJB and post SLJB with the exception of the AF. The fundamentals haven't changed, the needs in the ME haven't changed, the ability to fill the shortage needs haven't changed. The only thing that has changed is I'm not looking to flip or dip or make a quick buck. IMO This stock requires patience for possibly one of the greatest finds any of us have been involved in. All just my opinions.
icon url

lockstock31

10/06/06 8:05 AM

#111112 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

Everyone always assumes that naked shorts "have" to be covered. Why can't they just remain uncovered? How easily can the owner (MM or individual) of any individual naked short sale be identified by enforcement authorities?
icon url

Mojocash

10/06/06 8:07 AM

#111113 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

fish-
"it's so hard to understand" when a ceo drags an audit out this long.
"it's so hard to understand" when they promised a form 10 and never filed it.
Don't get me wrong here...
IF audited financials do come out and match the estimate of the sulja website, then this will fly.
I believe the short happened during the loftworks tenure and is probably as big as you say. IMO.
But since July of this year, the short interest has been next to nothing!
I say Petar : chit or get off the pot !


icon url

Crazy Money

10/06/06 9:05 AM

#111148 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

Once again a spot on post by FISH ...eom
icon url

4Justice

10/06/06 10:01 AM

#111238 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

Good post Fish.
icon url

J.C.N.

10/06/06 10:10 AM

#111251 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

Fish,
Naked short selling continues across the exchanges IMHO. Some more than others with different stocks. IMHO this stock is no different and yes there were and have been and probably will continue to be shares sold that do not exist until AF and then at some point the short squeeze. Should be fun for us and very sad days for shorters.
Brent
icon url

badmoon_ryzzin

10/06/06 11:11 AM

#111348 RE: Fishforbreakfast #111099

Looking at the history of this stock, since July 1/05, the stock (lfwk) declined from 30 cents to 2 cents averaging 18.5 cents to Sept 15/05. Volume during that period was extremely low by today's standardse frame so the stock traded less than 25 million shares. Since Sept 15/05 to Feb 28/06, the stock price averaged .5 cents with volume fairly heavy 1billion shares traded for this period. Is this the timeframe that Party bought his 40 million sub one penny? This means to me that if the company was significantly shorted in the amount of 200 million it would have occurred post September 15/05 at an average price of half a cent; and with the current price in excess of 7 cents since the end of July, the alarm bells would have gone off due to the short position priced at market (at least 7 cents) and they (Nite and co) would cover as soon as possible. I believe they have already covered, and I believe that during Steve Sulja's pump job during August that 100 million of 362 million insiders shares were dumped (leaving 262 million and effective control within management) to create a larger float for their partner Wessel to buy. Are you going to make a partner who steers large contracts your way pay 50 cents a share, or will you let them buy relatively cheap. F/S will be released when the auditor is in a position to sign off and wessal is done buying. As far as the audit delays are concerned, I believe they were using a local auditor and just recently wanted an internationally recognized auditor, who has to rely and perhaps re-verify things the previous auditor did, and this may take more time especially when filing with the SEC. I also think Sulja has very little internal controls on processes generating financial information and this also takes more time to verify information. Buy only on fundamentals, the short position would be gravy, but I am not counting on it.