InvestorsHub Logo

Niagara

02/03/18 9:00 AM

#40402 RE: parinvestor #40374

I never said there was precedent for your hypothetical set of facts. When I was in law school I did learn however that writing lies for the specific purpose of hurting a person or entity is libel and that is not protected speech. That is how i view the hit piece.

Niagara

02/03/18 9:08 AM

#40403 RE: parinvestor #40374

Parinvestor - I think we are both bulls on this stock...libel or not, the article was a piece of crap and I think we agree on that.