InvestorsHub Logo

buxcapital

01/26/18 4:08 PM

#37893 RE: rrojarom #37890

WOW TOM IS A POS

Amac1001

01/27/18 12:59 AM

#37898 RE: rrojarom #37890

THIS INMG VS TSMI WAR MAKES NO SENSE!!

Doesn’t anyone here bickering understand the interrelatedness of the two entities...Pre-Press Release, the price of .004 x 40 million shares = market cap of $160,000. TSMI owns 10 million INMG shares...INMG shares trade at .01...that means $100,000 (2/3rds) of the enterprise value of TSMI is attributable to INMG investment. Now the market cap of TSMI is around $800k, so the INMG investment is still $100k.
If the INMG stock goes up to .10, that would increase the investment value to $1 million and DOUBLE THE VALUE OF TSMI...

TSMI investors should be the worlds biggest INMG pumpers as a major asset of theirs is INMG stock...

Now with the new venture, INMG needs TSMI because TSMI is administering the Kush Processing program (I confirmed this with INMG’s Investor Relations department).
TSMI needs INMG because the product is being marketed on INMG’s website and to the vendors using the Cannibis Directory website that INMG now owns.
The two are jointly running Kush...if one fails, the other suffers.

Please explain what you stand to gain from bashing INMG (and vice versa)...if INMG went bankrupt today, TSMI would lose 1/8th of its enterprise value from the stock and probably 50% from disruption to the Kush product.

Mutually assured destruction folks...please end the childishness and understand what you’ve invested in and what drives its value. INMG should be rooting hard for TSMI and TSMI should be rooting hard for INMG...investors in one should probably own the other.