Good point. "Reincorporate" doesn't definitively imply screwing current shareholders. I agree that it's vague. I suppose that's exactly why I took the skeptical view of it.
I don't know how to word this, but taking into account the record of the gvt's treatment of shareholders, I think a high amount of skepticism is required. And just keep reminding ourselves of one of the utmost important questions: why were/are the common still allowed to trade, both after the initial '08 action and the '12 3rd amendment?
I think most of the answers to that question start to reveal the massive scope of the gvt's criminal intent and criminal actions.