InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Crow3

10/04/06 4:02 PM

#14819 RE: d4diddy #14818

You are right.. There is no court order REQUIRING confidentiality.. As a private company, ASD has no duty to disclose, CDEX has a duty to disclose material events.

But at any rate, CDEX cannot really button it up.. too many people know about it. Maybe the CAP will let it slip. Or some
other PPer.
icon url

paige

10/04/06 4:03 PM

#14820 RE: d4diddy #14818

I think we just got outselves an "added news wire" by both parties because one party didn't do what they were suppose to...
icon url

Xenophon

10/04/06 6:41 PM

#14822 RE: d4diddy #14818

CDEx sez: "The license is subject to payment by CDEX to ASD of certain royalties under a fixed payment schedule as well as possible additional royalties for updates to the system and maintenance under certain circumstances."
icon url

d4diddy

10/04/06 7:57 PM

#14825 RE: d4diddy #14818

I've learned that in a settlement agreement of this nature, Judge Schaffer does not allow access to the settlement transcripts without approval of both Parties. If both Parties approve the request, the requesting party must then petition the court for final approval.

Edit/delete