Replies to post #277442 on American Green Inc (ERBB)

[KickolasNage]

We've already been over this.

Though American Green plans to host a variety of pot-friendly weekend events, Rosati said the company has no immediate plans to push for a change in law. He said Nipton is content with creating a welcoming destination where visitors can enjoy pot products they have purchased elsewhere.

http://www.latimes.com/travel/deals/la-tr-california-nipton-owned-by-pot-company-20180101-story.html

They didn't plan on selling marijuana there, it's always been a "marijuana hospitality destination" where people can relax and "bring their own weed" without fear of being judged. You know, just like most cities in California. They can't sell marijuana in Nipton.

Good ole American Green back of tricks leading on investors.

AMERICAN GREEN HAS MORE POSITIVES THAN NEGATIVES IN THEIR BUSINESS VENTURES. ITS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE THE SHAREHOLDERS REALIZE THIS AND RUN UP THE STOCK TO ITS TRUE REPRESENTATIVE VALUE

Have you seen how many past failed ventures this company has? Shady deals and false promises? Negatives certainly outweigh the positives, this isn't some pie-in-the-sky money maker here. This pig is ready to be slaughtered. Shareholders have spoken and that's why we're at 0.0015 and dropping. Glad I don't invest in American Green.

[frontloading]

So insiders can loan AG funds in exchange for CD at 50% off 52 week low share price with 10% interest..and core consultants draw decent pay..enabled by repeated SOS Wyoming A/S increases to 25B, gagged Transfer Agent , and constant ttrades...Nipton deal just presents opportunity for more grand scale...impressive move for AG gang.

[IMKCBUCKY]

Perhaps you should call Gwyther and ask him? But like I said in my post the facts are the facts per San Bernardino County Ordinance 4309, passed---2016 (so this is not "old laws")

84.34.030 Prohibition of Commercial Cannabis Activity.

Except as expressly provided by §§ 84.34.040 and 83.34.050, commercial cannabis activity shall not be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use in any land use zoning district. Commercial cannabis activity, including delivery, is prohibited in all land use zoning districts, as those may be amended from time to time, and no permit of any type shall be issued therefor. It shall be unlawful for any person to conduct, cause to be conducted, or permit to be conducted, a commercial cannabis activity within the unincorporated area of the County.[color=red][/color] This Section shall not affect the right to possess or use cannabis as authorized by Federal or State law.

(Ord. 4309, passed – -2016)

Here is the link if you would like to read it for yourself? This issue has been covered repeatedly over the last several months on this board. The fact is that it is illegal for unincorporated Nipton CA. to cultivate or sell marijuana.

http://cannabusinesslaw.com/california-cannabis-laws-by-county/san-bernardino-county/


ERBB NOT ON IN NIPTON!!!