InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

famlydog

08/29/03 12:44 PM

#16258 RE: austin01 #16257

Yes they do Austin. They also know we will not like it. There could be a varity of reasons for not telling us.

The companies in question could have requested us not too. Many reasons for this as you can let your imagination run.

New Visual, like you infer, are stupid and don't realise the impact of telling us the names of these testers.

New Visual does not want the companies in question to be bombarded with questions from other companies and/or us.

New Visual is waiting for our FPGA to be completed before getting up on stage for the world to view and question.

So credibility need not be in question as much as they are following a predetermined plan in our technology development.
These are my opinions and not necessarilly reflect the real reasons, I believe they are indeed working on the tech so my opinions do not include possibilities of fraud.

icon url

427Cobra

08/29/03 12:59 PM

#16259 RE: austin01 #16257

austin: The companies have not agreed to have their names released the last I heard, so give it a rest.

If everything NV leadership does is suspect to you, why in the world do you own the stock?????