InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bidrite

01/12/18 7:21 AM

#322431 RE: Protector #322417

bitride, it cannot be wrong because it is an opinion. That is what IMO means.



The evidence that you stated to formulate your opinion is factually inaccurate. So yes, you can be and are wrong.

You wrote and stated as fact:

I am still troubled by the 'likeness' of what Ronin proposed for PPHM and what at the same time PPHM was already executing since H1 2017, without Roning having ever seen the strategic plan.

PPHM is exactly where the ex-BoD and Ronin both wanted it in begin 2017 even before we heard the name Ronin. The firing of most R&D people proves it



You can't have it both ways, if they were already executing Ronin's plan as you state then it was a bold face lie on every PR & CC.