You dont get it. Putting the motion to dismiss aside while spending 2-3 years to dig up documents to help her decide whether or not we can even proceed with a takings trial is “entertaining a motion to dismiss”. She has given the Gov the most important thing. Time. Had the takings suit been done before an Article 3 judge with a jury of our peers the discovery would have occured during the trial as evidence. Instead we have a secret quick peek and in the end only She will decide if we can proceed to a trial. Dont you see this about way more than FNMA. This is about our rights as citizens and property rights. That are slowly eroding to the point that we dont even know what our rights are anymore. Most posters on this board just want to make their profit. I would like to as well but I think this issue needs to get fixed. I hope Sammons prevails. We will all be better off in the long run.