InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

georgeiporgi

01/07/18 9:30 AM

#1630 RE: Pan4Au #1629

well hows about some insight about ecpn from you panipoo, you seem to have a lot to say about other posters but very little to say about the subject at hand. What do you think the ecpn revenue numbers will be for 2017? The dilution numbers?
The number of blatant lies from Stumbleton? (that's a tough one, possibly too many to count).
You could fill us in on your opinion about why no real refiners/mineral processors are interested in the super ultra concentrates.
Why has stumbleton stopped talking about osmium?
Why the most exciting pictures they can put on the web site are numerous views of jersey barriers?
When will they raise the authorized share count so they can keep the blatant dilution going?
What has the $31,000,000, spent by ecpn in the last 14 years, produced except bulging pockets for insiders and their cohorts?
The entire board would be interested to hear your insights into these and other questions.
icon url

gitreal

01/07/18 12:00 PM

#1631 RE: Pan4Au #1629

Too bad because they could calm people's nerves.

Calming people's nerves? That is exactly what ECPN management would like. Keep the herd calm, keep the money flowing in. No complaints allowed, no independent thought.....just continue to accept the ludicrous claims of this company as fact. And buy more shares.....