Replies to post #45203 on Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[Dutch1]

I did post this mainly because someone claimed that BTZO should be worth more when it comes to the outcome of the settlement then GERS, which I clearly disagree. I agree with Nobody12378 that in fact we know very little of who owns what. But I assume that the 80% held by BTZO is still valid until something evidence is showing it has changed.

Yes you could say, BTZO should be rising in line with GERS. But that's the point with investing. A stock is only worth what one is willing to pay for it. IMO since GERS is the holder of the patent where all the fuzz is about, they are more certain to get the attention. BTZO will not be named in any court documents, so the chance is high people are less willing to invest in BTZO and therefore, the price might rise less then one would expect by the percentage owned of GERS alone.