Replies to post #46132 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[GTCar]

VPLM provided them to simply show that they had NOTHING to do with them...

Petitioner¿¿¿s Motion For Entry Of Judgment In Favor Of Petitioner As A Sanction For Improper Ex Parte Communications By Patent Owner, Or, Alternatively, For Entirely New And Constitutionally Correct Proceedings

There in lies the inherent issue that Apple is claiming the patent owner had improper communication, I am sorry but Dr. Sawyer does not own these patents, nor was he responsible for the company any longer...


Are you claiming that if I go threaten a PTAB Judge that VPLM is criminally responsible because I am a shareholder?

One can argue this till the cows come home, it's called perspective and my eyes are wide open.