We were talking about the crappy app and advertising platform. I don't remember saying it was low margin, just that those two things have a major uphill battle. It would be nice if things worked out in your favor this time. You've been defending mcig for years with little to show for it.
This first bit of reporting may be skewed as they may have booked specific services that are high margin, but perhaps what is remaining in the contract you state exists may not be as good. I still don't think we have a clue what services were even rendered. I think that is important to communicate.
You got to admit, mcig really lucked out getting this revenue booked in q2. Had it been booked in q3, this would be a blood bath.
IMO, the way the financials were written, "media" had nothing to do with "IT". At first glance, the report was very vague as to what, where, when, with who, and how MCIG came up with $1.25 mil in "media".
Is this like your inability to know the difference between FY and CY? Or your inability to know the difference between Inc. and LLP?
Sounds like your making stuff up about "cryptocurrency services" being "media" now.
Where MD and I said anything about profit margins for "technology"
Again, you spend so much time debunking yourself, that you don't know that you just debunked yourself AGAIN! :)
It's ridonkulously hilarious. Again, we are all laughing again at you.
1) we said CR(APP) was crap. The proof of concept has failed. 2) we said e-coin ATMs is a CR(APP) idea for MJ Dispensors; mostly because everyone knows it's a cash business....and bring cash to buy mj.
No, sorry, you debunked yourself again...
Speaking of being right, didn't I tell you technology had a high profit margin while you and Bubba were dumping on it? SMHL
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
