InvestorsHub Logo

El_Jefe42

12/15/17 12:22 PM

#55591 RE: alanthill #55590

I can't agree with this statement. Additive manufacturing is nowhere near mature, and there continue to be a variety of issues that plague the progress of the industry. Listen to Melissa Orme, CTO of Morf3D, discuss the industry it in a recent panel discussion (YouTube Video Link), and one can easily see that there is a long way to go before maturity is even a viable discussion when it comes to AM.

I, as many, am frustrated with the performance of the company's stock. It's been abysmal. However, we are nowhere near being able to judge the long term value that PR3D may have on the industry. To each his own ...


The argument that the industry lacks maturity and therefore is not ready for a sophisticated quality assurance product simply does not wash any longer.

RiskReward1

12/15/17 12:49 PM

#55593 RE: alanthill #55590

Alan - I think there's a lot that we can't know yet re the technology and its potential market value. We may have something of value that yes the market may not being ready for -- but perhaps combined with other technologies could achieve marketability, either sooner or later.

Look at the 3DSim deal -- does it mean an immediate or certain traditional revenue stream? Likely not, -- but if our technology bears out their technology, and if they are valuable enough for a large, respected software simulation firm to purchase, then this could represent both a future revenue stream and at the same time may represent a window into the usefulness of PrintRite.

I don't feel able to assign a specific probability of success for PrintRite and Sigma. My opinion is that there's a decent shot there. I view this much like a VC investment that you do your best dd possible on, but can't wrap your hands around entirely -- decent shot -- but of course far from guaranteed.