InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Mugsy

12/10/17 6:00 PM

#29884 RE: grantastic #29883

I don’t believe they said it was a $15 million acquisition but rather an acquisition of a company that has $15 million yearly revenue.
icon url

kasia8

12/10/17 6:57 PM

#29886 RE: grantastic #29883

So would you recommend selling into 1.5B bid where probably half of that are shorts trying to cover? lol.
icon url

BeeDoubleU

12/10/17 7:00 PM

#29887 RE: grantastic #29883

Bob never said $15M acquisition
icon url

nfrequent

12/10/17 7:01 PM

#29888 RE: grantastic #29883

1. With the some of the same darned shares you are calling dilution.

2. Value after restructuring to capture the cash flow earned through the growth of the last three years and even higher level of revenues after expansion now completed plus value after acquisition.

3. Simply by amending the number of AS left not outstanding after the acquisition and with buybacks of OS made possible by the growth and the restructuring.

4. The institutional investors bought in. (Few had to convert at .0001.)

5. Product costs increase in proportion with growth plus debt servicing, conversion charges, and the $500,000 cash purchase of new equipment for the expansion.

6. Trying to stay ahead of all the misinformation being spread rampantly and intentionally (mostly by short sellers).

Now, where do I send you the invoice for the business lesson?

icon url

FILLORKILL

12/10/17 7:14 PM

#29890 RE: grantastic #29883

How can other stocks run when most are garbage as well?