InvestorsHub Logo

IronMan123

12/09/17 10:19 AM

#440482 RE: fnmaowner12 #440480

What about F&F????? Having to fight like hell to get the same kind of docs.

Donotunderstand

12/09/17 12:37 PM

#440489 RE: fnmaowner12 #440480

Just to be clear

SCOTUS did not rule on the underlying issue (not sure if before them or will be before them)

SCOTUS ruled to grant a stay

cfljmljfl

12/09/17 12:53 PM

#440493 RE: fnmaowner12 #440480

So all documents in the cship and. 3 amendment should be made available for judicial review to make an inform and just decision. Not as stupid as we believe , courts just selective on policy and process to support their personal ideology ?

955

12/09/17 3:46 PM

#440502 RE: fnmaowner12 #440480

WHOA! Now that's a precedent we could ALL live with! Does anyone think SCOTUS was thinking of the F&F court cases when they granted the stay?




“Judicial review cannot function if the agency is permitted to decide unilaterally what documents it submits to the reviewing court as the administrative record,” Breyer added in the dissent. “Effective review depends upon the administrative record containing all relevant materials presented to the agency, including not only materials supportive of the government’s decision but also materials contrary to the government’s decision.”






yambike

12/09/17 5:39 PM

#440507 RE: fnmaowner12 #440480

The law of the land is so massive with many conflicting precedents and rules. Courts can pretty much pick and choose whatever verbiage to fit their ruling.

Yeah, yeah, so they say "full administrative record" for DACA ruling.

I fear they will cite "adminstrative privilege, definition of "may", "not going to second guess decisions made during crisis" etc when they rule against us.

Very disillusioned by the whole process thus far. Until a court actually uses common sense to make a ruling, I wouldn't put much weight on this DACA ruling.

The rule of law really is tired apparently.