InvestorsHub Logo

Clutch29

12/07/17 10:34 AM

#440077 RE: HoldenWalker99 #440076

Still not our day. Sad common owner rite now:-(

Donotunderstand

12/07/17 10:39 AM

#440080 RE: HoldenWalker99 #440076

he is not wrong?

we can have a friendly difference

I think the creation of FNMA as a GOV agency was GREAT

Donotunderstand

12/07/17 10:40 AM

#440081 RE: HoldenWalker99 #440076

So it appears

Some version of Moelis - yes Corker-Warner Moelis is the starting point

So it appears from reporting so far --- albeit by VERY limited sources

TheDon3

12/07/17 10:41 AM

#440082 RE: HoldenWalker99 #440076

What incentive would Corker have to preserve the GSEs, much less help the preferred? He's retiring as well and not up for reelection lol. This is the same guy who said he wouldn't help hedge funds and his animosity to them was one of the reasons he wouldn't be in favor of recap and release.

There's no bill. Nothing's under discussion. Congress leaves in less than two weeks. I call BS.

Plus you're talking about a March deadline at most.

Preferred shares are also non cumulative meaning GSEs can pay out dividends when they choose too.
Preferred stock most of it is not transferable either.

Choose wisely.

kthomp19

12/07/17 2:04 PM

#440158 RE: HoldenWalker99 #440076


Corker-Warner/Moelis is the plan.



This doesn't make any sense. The Moelis plan was drafted as a purely administrative reform. We don't have nearly enough information about Corker-Warner II to make any comparisons yet.