Luckily, existing locations and those to be acquired already possess an established MMJ patient base, making the argument a moot point.
As with the Nevada program, the objective is the increase in sales due to the specific region and states annual visitors, which in California's case the last documented number was 251 million visitors. Not remotely close to Nevada's 45MM, but I believe it will suffice especially since the L.A and S.F CSA's including annual visitors essentially mirror that of the entire Nevada market.
I believe this was their comments to open the day yesterday justifying the argument the California adult use market shouldn't make any impact on revenue's or operations.
Speaks for itself ;) lol
I suppose no more valid than pointing out a bad review(s) of a retail business anywhere in America that actively serves thousands of customers, let alone complaints about pricing in a market (Vegas) which is divided between establishments that serve the local community vs. those serving the tourist population.
Funny stuff today. Amusing as always. lol