You're confusing info from the trade shows. The list of "QMC Partners and Potential Customers" was from Display Week in May 2017. It was in Clay's update following Display Week.
Also, Sri and company were only interested in setting the company up to sell. That was the what I took away from the whole proxy granting them writes to issue preferred shares. They would have given themselves more voting rights than common shares holders and basically overruled us. Yes, we all would have had a good gain from a sale, but not what we will gain if QMC meets the market.
Also, to note, after CES and Sri departure, we were informed that the reactors were actually offline. They apparently were doing batch production for whatever reason. Why would a continuous flow tech company even waste time on trial batches that they would then have to convert into continuous flow and, yet again, calibrate the process to have the same quality of quantum dots on the output?
To me it seems like Sri and company where spinning their wheels wasting time and money. If you create a great batch qdot, it doesn't me you can automatically recreate it in continuous flow or scale it to large batches. This is a thing that Nanoco seems to be struggling for many years.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
