BECAUSE....when someone says NO AE's and NO resistance (and of course, equivalent or improved efficacy), without conformational completed evidence, it is imperative to keep statements like that in check. As long as statements like the above are advocated, I will respond accordingly. IMO
So you guarantee your opinion is right and all others are wrong, despite the fact you nothing more than anyone else? How can you say that they will be side effects when you flat out don’t know and claim that others are uninformed if they think there will be no side effects despite all past trials have shown that there are none?