Replies to post #46325 on Medizone Intl. (fka MZEIQ)

[GreenOwner]

I guess that if you, of all people, could not follow my post, then maybe I did not make my message clear and perhaps everybody read it incorrectly.

This is what I was trying to emphasize:
I am not comparing IBM to Medizone. I am trying to discuss any infant technology that is innovative, but yet to be accepted into the Marketplace.
When IBM looked at the first computer, they were not interested because they estimated the need for the country at perhaps 4 machines. If you consider an iPhone as a computer, which it is, then just in my household, we own 5 computers. And that is just current, functional computers. We have had as many as about 11 in all.

I am not comparing Medizone to United Airlines either, but when airplanes were first invented, nobody thought much about a Flying Machine. Today, there are many individuals who actually own their own aircraft.

I am not comparing Medizone to Port-a-John's, however, when the idea of Indoor bathrooms was invented, people would not pay for it. They only wanted their Outhouse.

I hope this helps explain the difference between new, innovative technology and the circuitous course that is required, rather than what you thought was comparing a COMPANY, like IBM to Medizone. IBM has been in the DOW Industrials for many decades and is a very mature company with many products and Tens of Thousands of patents. Medizone has never sold anything, except stock. They are new and their product is new and yet to receive FDA.

So, in summary. I hope you now understand that I was NOT comparing Medizone to a Fortune 500 company. I was ONLY discussing the typical pathway that new Ideas and inventions must take.

Does that clear up the misunderstanding?