"so what?..and let me know exactly how many shares jon and ben own.."
Again, you are deflecting away from the issue. My point is that they own enough shares that they want this to reach one dollar more than even we do. That is my point.
"hes been paying himself quite handsomely so that should he fail, he will still make out like a bandit..."
You are playing the class warfare card again. All CEO's make a ton of money. Again, you are deflecting away from your initial point that Kim is robbing us blind; he is stealing from the poor, he is robbing the church, yada yada. He is not.
He is owed money by the company, and he is yet to collect it. No other CEO would do that. Just look up George Alvarez of VELA. Now, that guy robbed the shareholders blind and bankrupted the company. Take a look at Rich DeCicco. He too has been making a ton of money, and he really is ripping off shareholders. Compare them to KT, and you will understand how your point of Kim ripping us off is not correct.
"but its still on the books as owed to him..so he hasn't taken some of the money owed to him..yet..so why is that a big deal?.."
It's a big deal because you are saying that he is ripping off shareholders and the company. Why would a CEO who has not even collected all of the money owed to him be referred to as a person who is ripping the company off?
"maybe he should start with his shareholders and make himself a little accountable to them before he starts to concern himself with the rest of the world.."
I think he is communicating more than ever before yet for some, it is not enough. Once we enter Vietnam, PR's will increase, IMHO. Plus, as you certainly know, no matter what Kim says or does, someone will complain.
"he would be moving much faster..hes not..hes moving slower than molasses.."
He is moving as fast as he can for a man with a shoe string budget. His hands are tied in Vietnam. You of all people should understand that. You cannot speed up something over which you have no control. This is the biggest hangup, and Kim has no control over it. However, I am sure if you were CEO, we would have begun production there three years ago.
"I have no interest in what they may or may not gain."
LOL. You most certainly do! All you concern yourself with is Kim's moving as slow as molasses, and more importantly, how he is making out like a bandit ripping off shareholders.
"you are supposed to learn from your mistakes."
And how do you know he hasn't? There is no proof that he has not. And do not saying things are taking too long. Vietnam is the entire problem. Had we begun production there three years ago, the stock would be way past one dollar, I believe. So, blame Vietnam instead of Kim. His hands are tied with a Vietnamese, bureaucratic rope. The mistake he made was not attempting to enter another country at the same time.
"might be time to get a clue."
I have said it before, and I will say it again, Vietnam is and continues to be the issue. We all know if you were CEO, the deal with Vietnam would have been done ten years ago. LOL...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
