InvestorsHub Logo

Deviant Trader

11/17/17 8:39 PM

#34532 RE: Elkay11 #34530

What I typed was

Occam's Razor suggests the simplest possible explanation based on existing data is usually the correct conclusion

All things being equal this is usually the case. The assumption that was made was apparently in what I do not say. I understand what you are trying to say but the data I was looking out does not support something that complex. As for your supporting data? Oh, there is no supporting data, no idea how many trades took place, what days they took place, at what price, how often the trades took place, etc. Just a statement

the assumption is flawed

Well, thank you for your insightful input. It has truly been an enlightening and exhilarating experience discussing this theory with you. GLTY as well.