That's odd.
Some would like to think McCusker is no longer involved with the company because they don't wish to face the fact the the debts listed in his BK filing were actually company debts.
Take the money owed in connection with the lawsuit brought in Kansas by Joly and the other employee. It was filed against McCusker Holding (no s) and Will McCusker. Hawley evidently accepted that suit as a company liability. He referenced it in the conference call in late September, saying he didn't think it would be a problem.
That was because there was something he failed to mention: that McCusker and McCusker Holding had defaulted on the suit. And that McCusker had filed a bankruptcy petition in which the Kansas judgment was listed as a debt.
Once again, McCusker also stated in the petition that nearly all the debts in question were company debts, not personal debts. The idea, obviously, was to pretend McCusker Holding (no s) was in no way related to McCusker Holdings (with an s).
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
