Fair you're right. Sorry i keep updating my posts, just saving my 15 a day. My question still stands. Why clarify that?
No matter the deal GERS gets 20 (theoretically) and 20 and 20 and 20. As in, they're always getting 20. Unless of course, being the actual company in litigation, they're forced to pay the fees (saw someone else say maybe guilty parties will pay more of those fees, that'd be nice)
So now BTZO gets 16% (theoretically).
But why clarify.
GERS isn't getting anymore as a result. An Jesus investor shouldn't be anymore likely to invest in GERS because the pot hasn't been sweetened at all for GERS. They're still getting the same thing. So what's the point of the message? GERS might get more? Maybe?
And, as I've observed previously, math based on human activity is doomed to fail. Who knows how people would respond. For all i know, GERS flies up BTZO sputters. Conversely, BTZO flies, GERS gets the shaft. Its all possible and its, in my opinion, an exercise in futility to try and predict how investors will respond to the settlement.
Appreciate your math and input. Just having an open discussion.
And yes i guess that's how KK is getting his. Hide it all in FCC where he takes home the lions share.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
