InvestorsHub Logo

DrZem

11/16/17 5:00 PM

#48130 RE: Alydyr #48126

"MUST READ ... Disgraceful & Embarrassing"

If I were a CPA, I might agree. But I'm not, and I don't.

Stepping back, and looking at the broader picture, the cited differences are just noise to me. 1% is seldom relevant for highly volatile stocks.

loanranger

11/20/17 9:00 AM

#48144 RE: Alydyr #48126

The company has updated and replaced the Quarterly Report with one that actually includes a Cash Flow Statement. (That's the fourth quarter in a row that they had to replace a filing.)

There don't appear to be any changes in any dollar amounts in the current year....I didn't study the outstanding share amounts very carefully. I DID notice that the approximate difference between the balance sheet and the other 3 references you noted was very close to the 952,043 share New Issuance to Alpha Capital Anstalt on 9/20.

I also noticed this, which was in the original as well:

"2017 Stock Option Plan
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we adopted the “2017” Executive and Key Man/Woman Stock Option Plan and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 450,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at the strike price of $.08 per share. As of June 30, 2017, all options allowed under the plan have been granted and are exercisable at the election of the holder."

The recipient(s) of the 450,000 immediately exercisable options weren't identified and the Plan itself was not filed, but this is more than a little bit interesting:

Per the June Quarterly Quarterly report:
"During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we re-adopted the “2012” Executive and Key Man/Woman Stock
Option Plan into the “2017” Executive and Key Man/Woman Stock Option Plan and granted incentive and
nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 450,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at the
strike price of $.08 per share."
Page 21 of the June Supplementary Disclosures indicates that Keith Berman received zero options in 2015, 2016 and 2017. Who else might have received those options?
https://www.otcmarkets.com/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=177493

When we look at the current Supplementary Report for the period ended 9/30 there are again no options reported in the compensation table provided for KB, but the Table shows that it includes compensation for 2014, 2015 and 2016....and not 2017. It's a weird mistake to make given that the proper years were correctly identified in the prior quarter.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=182276 p.22

So who's getting the options? The financial statement reports "Options issued for employee compensation" of $36,000, which happens to be 450,000 times $.08 but Directors are not employees, so who's getting the options?



The other thing I haven't seen in either the original reports or the replacement...and it can't be an issue of carelessness...was an explanation of where in Sam Hill the $3 million bucks due for the Preferred shares that were recorded at the end of the LAST quarter might be. Did I miss it? There doesn't seem to be a lot of concern expressed about it.
The 370 Preferred D shares showed as issued in the Statement of Shareholders Equity in this and last Quarter's filings but both also showed "Total shares outstanding: NONE" for the Series in the Security Information section. There may be some sketchy technical explanation for that but there's none for this:

Where's the cash?