UVS Good post -it is factual and to the point. My take it is even a better situation than many have envisioned. Why run two acceptable techniques(Monte Carlo & Black Sholes)to justify past actions in regards to disposition of stock. This costs money and for internal personal justification not required-one technique is satisfactory. On the other hand if there are outside suitors involved it is worth the cost to remove any doubt on past actions that be might be of concern. Also consider acquisition by strictly exchange of stock. This requires no cash from the acquiring entity that suddenly becomes a player in this highly technical field that will shed light on diseases that have plagued mankind for years. Example--detecting changes in cell structure that will open the door for a cure to Parkinson's disease. And some have labeled this a scam? Let me see anyone out there that can run a scam on cell detection when every medical research entity will be examining your work to find a flaw in it. Especially when you are dealing with someone's life. Once and for all scratch off the scam label and focus on the financial condition of the company. Back to the investor's cry "Let's see the financials" All of the above is just my humble opinion.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
