At some point, you'd think the SEC would tell a company that multiple reverse splits just cannot be done. After one, if it doesn't work, then you have to either sell, merge of go bankrupt. There seems to be zero benfit to existing shareholders to do a reverse split. Seeing as though this is the third time and all it has done is destroy shareholder's potential value, maybe the SEC would want to take a look at the actual benefit to the public for a company to do this. Seems like a manipulative process and one that results in very little, if any, benefit to investors.