Replies to post #14500 on Cdex, Inc. (fka CDEX)

[sanddollar]

Then why was one caller denied the right to particopate, moonie?

That sounds pretty "selective" to me.

[d4diddy]

"I think high c got a taste of what liars the bunch of you are when diddy inferred that the calls and questions were pre-screened."

Are you calling me a liar WMFT?

And what did I infer? What I posted was my first impression right after listening to the broadcast. It wasn't a lie.

If I really wanted to infer I'd have noted several disturbing observations.

1. There was a total of five callers out of thousands of shareholders.

2. Out of the five callers, one is a CDEx stock promoter on the message borads, three particpated in the CA lawsuit and one is a Loch/CDEx apologist.

3. Griffin knew four of them by their first name.

4. High C said his question wasn't pre-screened and I have no reason not to believe him, but that represents only about 10% of the questions asked. It's also interesting to note that High C's question was the only one which appeared to be misinterpreted by Griffin as Crow has pointed out.

Loch/CDEx has a history of pre-screening everything they do so until proven otherwise I will continue to have the impression that several of the questions were know in advanced.

It reminded me of a White House news conference.