InvestorsHub Logo

Kid-Gloves

10/21/17 10:01 PM

#21130 RE: The Rainmaker #21128

It doesn't work like that. Its not giving up control. As the new company used this.shell. the old company is no longer an issue. If they refused to relinquish rights to the shell , miss ceo could have bought a different shell. Its easier buying an existing one , then having to start one from scratch with all sec regs and hurdles

marexx

10/22/17 2:56 AM

#21134 RE: The Rainmaker #21128

Exactly! there is no reason to involve both parties if there is nothing to show here.
In my opinion they have something good but how good it is? is it worth Penny? or multiple penny? we will find out soon enough.
I jump in too this stock just after Sept. 20 huge volume spike, somebody bought several millions of PJET shares without any reason, this was good enough for me and I have seen this kind of situation before.... there is always a huge run after things like that happen.
As I said before.... there is no reason to involve both parties if something big wasn't in the cards.
This is OTC and with the right cards, right promotion and the right timing many people here may become very wealthy, not to mention PJET Board of Directors they may become multimillionaires almost instantly so the stakes are high but if they play the cards right everything is possible here. JMHO

pennystockbrad

10/22/17 10:12 AM

#21140 RE: The Rainmaker #21128

Except it wasn't a merger. The previous CEO took his planes and left.