Frankly, I took the articles as bad news, not good. (Hey, what do ya expect? ;-)) But I get the is optimism/pessimism thing so, whatever. We'll see how this plays out.
Funding isn't free. It's debt owed. I noticed, however, that although the one article says they got the funding the one about the arrest was published in April 2017, it's more recent (about a year after the funding article) and didn't mention the funding, just the default debt.
Heineken. Yes, I was thinking that could be good. Or it could be bad. Guess we'll have to wait and see how this plays out.
But, still, why couldn't this just be a simple GREAT THING instead of something that looks potentially bad and with problems? Well, at least to me. Damn DD. :-(
JMOs