InvestorsHub Logo

imtheshadow

10/18/17 4:47 PM

#433863 RE: rekcusdo #433861

Since we've already lost on this issue, having another shot at it, with the SCOTUS no less, is FAR better than no filing at all. Having some probability of success, no matter how small and/or far away, is significantly better than none.

jcromeenes

10/18/17 5:32 PM

#433870 RE: rekcusdo #433861

I would assume we would see a small bump if SCOTUS accepts the case but a CRUSHING blow if we lost. Sort of scary actually .

Rumpel

10/19/17 10:50 AM

#433926 RE: rekcusdo #433861

We'd get a huge bump, like 25%, just in anticipation. It probably would be fleeting, unless and until the plaintiffs prevailed. Then we'd rock and roll, IMHO.

s404n1tn0cc

10/20/17 9:52 AM

#434092 RE: rekcusdo #433861

........Nope no way

State issue. The Only Institution that can buy anything From Freddy or Fanny is the FED. The Treasury gave up that right to The Fed from the inception of the Fed. And made worse by the USA BK in 1933.
Also the purpose of the Treasury was to make money available at ZERO
percent interest. So by default it would violate it own mission statement. IMO That's right ZERO PERCENT Period

Donotunderstand

10/20/17 1:55 PM

#434137 RE: rekcusdo #433861

the news of SCOTUS agreeing to hear ... is positive and is often well in advance of a decision ... just saying