InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DTnooB

09/24/06 12:21 PM

#81518 RE: serfdom #81516

Still, I hardly think the opinions expressed in this board account for the 15,000+ share holders.
icon url

and then

09/24/06 12:30 PM

#81525 RE: serfdom #81516

Not at all if you can take a break from typing bash's for a second and lift your head up off your sweaty keyboard! You the bashers have over run the board. people for the most part either left or don't say so much anymore because of the gang mentality here, as soon as some pr, comes in you crap all over it! your like dogs what you can't eat or procreate you piss all over it! He needs ya!


JMHO
icon url

samaelrocks

09/24/06 12:32 PM

#81527 RE: serfdom #81516

Serfdom. Thanks for this post. It is a perfect example of why the likes of Our-Street and Stocklemon are immoral.

To go further with your post, let's take a company that has great fundamentals that get's the "bad curb appeal research" from the likes of the sites I mentioned above.

Even Our-Street has mentioned some of his picks turned out to be legit. I've seen some bashers suggest Rufus pay back those shareholders if he is lying and they lose everything. Therealdeal is the most recent in saying this. I wonder what your opinion is regarding "Rufus paying back losing shareholders" and how that compares to Our-Street's lack of paying back shareholders that lost a big portion of their portfolios from his jaded research.

Therealdeal - Do you also believe Our-Street should reimburse shareholders that lost out due to his web site the same way you believe that Rufus should if he is lying currently?
icon url

etouqe

09/24/06 1:12 PM

#81563 RE: serfdom #81516

Serfdom,
I dont question your opinions, I only wonder why would someone devote 14-16 hours a day to something they dont care about. It just makes absolutely no sense. You want people to believe you, but you say you have no interest in the stock and you are not in cahoots with anyone so why should anyone take you serious.
icon url

vozmil

09/24/06 1:52 PM

#81597 RE: serfdom #81516

Serf, very logic statement. I will refer to the example of Google and travelzoo. In case of Goog there was a lot of good will before launching of its IPO. Even in the presence of strong good will the promoters were not ready to launch the IPO price fixed earlier as $135.00 on the basis of $300million MCap. They reduce it down to $85.00 instead. Rest is history the stock was propelled to several hundrad dollars only on the basis of that reputation and good will and not on the fundamentals. This is what you believe is the secret of better performing stock.

But let us see the other example and that is of Travelzoo. The stock was worse reputation and 35% of the float was short. It was trading around $5.00 dollars. But than suddenly company gave a bullish report and stock propelled to $92 in few months. Here it was not good will but bad will of shoters responsible to take the stock sky.

Therefore even the the stock with bad PR and repuatation can increase in its value exponentially by little good news and too many bashers or shortes such as in case of CSHD. There are some black spots in every flying horse and that is true for CSHD. This stock has already gone from 0.20cents to a dollar without and audited financials. That is not without any good will but the level of shorting will take it to the sky. And if all we are not right the demage is not too big for average investor. Iam leaving to drop my son for Tie Kawando classes and will come back soo.

Long as usual.