Replies to post #31631 on Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc. (fka IHSI)

[Burn Notice88]

Thanks for forwarding this on to Paul, Smilin.

I should clarify, in support of a "Future Bid."

As for...

legal reps have valid reasons why certain issues cannot be addressed at present

...reminds me of the old Saturday morning "School House Rock!" video, "I'm Just a Bill," which takes forever.

I realize the company's involvement with legal is designed to keep them out of hot water, by doing things right and crossing all the t's and dotting all the i's, but the delays are very frustrating. They seemingly run counter to the way OTC Pinks operate with speed and efficiency, cutting through red tape on their way to the next, more-complex tier-level.

Since you seem to have a red bat-phone to Paul...

I have a few simple question maybe you can help with by getting answers from Paul.

1) Is management's relationship with legal / the new investor STILL support the long-term views (protections) of vested shareholders?

2) Is there a willingness to let this run? I mean, let it run! Reward existing shareholders. After a hard run, give those that hang on 72 hours notice (via PR) company plans to do RS. The stock may drop 60%-70% but investors will jump back in upon the RS to sustain the share price. MANY will want this as a longer-term hold. Both existing and new investors will pile in for that purpose. That's how you do it AND do it RIGHT! Reward your existing shareholders. They will REWARD you back in MORE ways than one.

3) Isn't conducting a RS before any attempt of a run, counter to past and present PRs and very misleading to and knifing existing shareholders in the back? Wouldn't a RS be an IR, management, investor nightmare? Let's face it. The company's reputation for supporting shareholders isn't exactly stellar. Who will trust this company post split, if they knife shareholders in the back? What about the loss in confidence of 800 investors who will be jumping ship and turning against them vs. existing shareholders marketting and promoting the company's unique value - they will scratch the company's back and be rewarded by making profits along the way. If the company jerks over shareholders and splits now, they will have an uphill battle having few past friends, screwing over the existing shareholder, then having a hell of a time attracting new "gun shy" investors fighting against a ton of investors who will be offloading the stock and dragging the pps down to triple zero 1 AGAIN and pissed off and bashing in the process.

Doesn't it make more sense to stick with a TEAM approach?

5) Will the company be able to rebrand themselves? Instead of achieving their goal of being a real company selling a novel new (Fazync) product and possibly being uplisted, IF they continue to screw over existing shareholders? Instead their reputation will continue to suffer. Trust will NEVER be restored. Trust is everything when trying to rebrand a tarished image.

Investors need to win for the company to win. MMs win. Investors win. The lender wins. The company wins. EVERYONE wins.