InvestorsHub Logo

gvandalay

10/04/17 4:57 PM

#42215 RE: lbird33 #42213

I'm surprised me and my personal feelings to the matter are of any relevance but yes it did bother me because to this day nobody can verify any of it nor even the existence of the company. It was simply swept under the mat.

The unfortunate thing is that as a shareholder it has been a "PREREQUISITE" to "SPECULATE" daily. Voippal is a SPECULATIVE investment and has carried on with a "READ BETWEEN THE LINES" mandate for years. I am here because of the patents. They exist, they have been issued. And now, they are being challenged. The important components eh.

Meanwhile these items such as detailing the infringement origins from 50+ companies and the like, are all relevant and important so why not address them versus more sweeping things under the rug?

keepemcloser

10/04/17 4:58 PM

#42216 RE: lbird33 #42213

So why couldn’t anyone confirm the existence of Southbank?
Why didn’t the company show proof of this supposed “Mandated” transactional offer,Sawyers words,not mine.