InvestorsHub Logo

ijeffc

09/28/17 2:25 PM

#112296 RE: linda1 #112295

The company needs to send a bill to that person that cancel.

ijeffc

09/28/17 2:26 PM

#112297 RE: linda1 #112295

Always wondered what happen to green cove.

askjsell

09/28/17 3:38 PM

#112310 RE: linda1 #112295

Dude,

"Also - some Shareholders have actually gone too far and
made Appointments to test if a Clinic is a Scam or not
but then did not Cancel or show up for the Appointment."

I call BS on this. How do you know shareholders have made fake appointments? When making the appointment, did the persons identify themselves as shareholders?

askjsell

09/28/17 3:44 PM

#112311 RE: linda1 #112295

Dude,

"some Shareholders have actually gone too far and
made Appointments to test if a Clinic is a Scam or not
but then did not Cancel or show up for the Appointment. "

Another reason why this is BS...when making an appointment with, you will likely need to provide a credit card. If you fail to show, you are still charged for the appointment.



askjsell

09/28/17 3:46 PM

#112312 RE: linda1 #112295

Dude,

" and he expressed
frustration at the excessive DD of some Shareholders
that is actually causing a loss of revenues for PAOG.
"
PAOG has poor revenues due to a lack of patients. That's why the stock is selling off and will be firmly under a penny soon.

dangbro

09/28/17 5:15 PM

#112319 RE: linda1 #112295

It is a shame that people do that. I agree with you 100%, Linda!

Dang

JEFFROCOLETRAIN

09/28/17 8:57 PM

#112324 RE: linda1 #112295

Thank you for the good laugh!!

It was the shareholders fault! LMAO

Hey everybody! Guess what? No record revenues for the next quarter, guaranteed! You shareholders just screwed that up!

Ive been preaching the whole time that their past affiliations with the crooks who ran those previous companies would be a problem. Guess that caught up faster than anyone would have expected!

Never in the history of the otc has a company ever blamed its own shareholders for tanking profits!!!

PAOG = SCAM

I wasn't 100% sure, but now I am!

samsamsamiam

09/29/17 10:32 AM

#112348 RE: linda1 #112295

Whom did you specifically speak with might I ask?

ATTENTION ALL SHAREHOLDERS:

I spoke with a person in IR for RSII yesterday - who
is also an Executive of PAOG - and he expressed
frustration at the excessive DD of some Shareholders
that is actually causing a loss of revenues for PAOG.

One of PAOG's Affiliates in Florida - Green Cove -
has quit the PAO Group because too many Shareholders
were calling the Clinic to question if it was a Scam.
This Clinic has been removed from altmedcenters.com.

Also - some Shareholders have actually gone too far and
made Appointments to test if a Clinic is a Scam or not
but then did not Cancel or show up for the Appointment.
The Company still has to pay the physician for the
Appointment when it is not cancelled.

PLEASE STOP DOING THIS or you may one day find
you are the Shareholder of a PRIVATE COMPANY.


---

Also did you mean Green Coast?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/waves-pao-group-inc-announces-145900079.html








samsamsamiam

09/29/17 11:37 AM

#112371 RE: linda1 #112295

How exactly did they determine it was a shareholder that made an appointment and never showed up?

No such thing as "excessive DD" when it comes to deciding where to invest your hard earned money.

That one Clinic that bowed out wasn't the one involving Robert Weber's close friends was it? I could see why they might bow out if the SEC or FINRA started asking questions. Especially about those kickback fees someone mentioned was going to the clinics.

lettuce VP

09/30/17 1:25 PM

#112448 RE: linda1 #112295

Sounds like the excuses are coming for a bad q3

NagStocks

09/30/17 3:25 PM

#112472 RE: linda1 #112295

I doubt it will heavily impact revenues.

Just like in goods based businesses there are returns.

And in service based businesses there will be late cancellations or no shows.

As long as their making enough successful appointments compared to loss due to cancellations. It shouldn't really be an issue. If their not. Then they need to do more marketing. To reduce the percentage and stay profitable.

I am sure the CEO accounts for such things. IR person may not be a business person.

Sure it may hurt some profits. But not enough to make them go private. lol.

But I understand your intentions are good. It's just successful businesses should already account for such losses.

As we all know we can't control people and what they may do.