InvestorsHub Logo

untohim

09/24/17 2:20 PM

#197980 RE: scottsmith #197979

we already know if b-om is as good as preliminary results leo will seek fast track. Not worried about a ph2b with b-up, because it will then be sought after by BP...as for K, we better pray that activating p53 doesn't catch fire with tumor shrinkage efficacy because the sciencesmiths of the world may have to give it a second look...lets not to forget about praying for P which aleady is in protective mode with the alpha and investigator bias groups, whose only results that we'll see is in January 18 imo, all imo

Pepperchino

09/24/17 2:22 PM

#197981 RE: scottsmith #197979

I think 2nd half of 2018 can be achieved if Leo and team stay laser focused like they have been this year. They've made AMAZING progress this year IMO.

groton68

09/24/17 2:34 PM

#197982 RE: scottsmith #197979

Stop already. Outright false. Leo had limited funds to proceed with UP and OM. ABSSSI was $30 million alone.

sox040713

09/24/17 5:55 PM

#197996 RE: scottsmith #197979

If B-OM top-line result is similar to interim analysis, Phase 2b won't be needed. It'll go straight to Phase 3 with possible BTD. I expect B-OM to be approved first.

UP needs a 2b definitely and OM might.

Jhawker

09/24/17 10:11 PM

#198007 RE: scottsmith #197979

Are you joking? Antibiotics are worth but a fraction of what the anti-inflammatory properties are worth. Why would we spend well over $30m on 1 trial when B-OM and B-UP will be worth more and create revenue for us quicker.