No third-party verification?
I thought that was the entire founding principal as stated by some as the ideal that separated some from others in terms of information?
Wait, isn't that bullshit coming from the same source that stated the "revised" financials indicated one of four things - audited financials, a reverse merger, an acquisition or a buyout? Which, by the way, was posted nearly five months ago?
So no source on any of this - a totally unfounded statement with no verifiable confirmation provided? I thought that went against the founding principal of statements passing a smell test to be worthy of being "stickied?"
Oh yea, that's believable, just like the flunky that is too busy "converting" all the A-list Disney films into 4K to spend 2 minutes updating Foley's completely empty 4kstudios calendar.
Hilarious.