Since I have a lot of both Q & G, I would support that Q has a large logistical stake in G in that that shared acreage will require cooperation and resources, and both are government sponsored both financially and philosophically.
I believe the Q has about 25% smaller float than G, and would want BOTH to reach goals, which are lofty and attainable to a mind boggling extent. I have read that Kate can overstate goals and time periods, but both stocks have more than doubled since I finished accumulating in early Sept.
As for that 2 months of accumulation, I would NEVER have had this leverage success if had sat on bids trying to get lowest price....can't make money if you don't have shares.
The G shareholders will tell you they have a better product, but really, who knows? For sure, they like cheer chatter.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
